"...For all those reasons, Washington would not be able to "lead from behind" as it did in Libya..."
źródło: " The Guardian"
Co nie jest akurat szczególnie interesujące i zostało przywołane tylko z powodu pośredniego potwierdzenia w treści artykułu ogromu zbrodni popełnionej przez wojska NATO w Libii:
"...The UK, France and other American allies in Europe used up their stocks of such weapons in Libya and although these are classified there have been reports that they have not yet returned to pre-Libya levels.
"We know they pretty much ran out of them at the end of Libya. Given budgetary constraints the Europeans are operating, and in an era where every euro spent on defence is very heavily scrutinised, it is a hard sell to restock on this stuff," Ben-Ari said. "And it would not be enough to be at Libya levels. You would need far more for Syria..."
(linked to)
Co nie jest akurat szczególnie interesujące i zostało przywołane tylko z powodu pośredniego potwierdzenia w treści artykułu ogromu zbrodni popełnionej przez wojska NATO w Libii:
"...The UK, France and other American allies in Europe used up their stocks of such weapons in Libya and although these are classified there have been reports that they have not yet returned to pre-Libya levels.
"We know they pretty much ran out of them at the end of Libya. Given budgetary constraints the Europeans are operating, and in an era where every euro spent on defence is very heavily scrutinised, it is a hard sell to restock on this stuff," Ben-Ari said. "And it would not be enough to be at Libya levels. You would need far more for Syria..."
(linked to)
