...koniec "gry wstępnej" ? na to wygląda...

"...After weeks of denials that U.S. troops were actively training Ukrainian forces on the new weapons they’ve been receiving, officials have been more upfront about the efforts. A senior DoD official said Wednesday that American service members had begun training outside the country with more than 50 Ukrainian troops on 155mm howitzer artillery systems the Biden administration was providing as part of a recent aid package worth $800 million..." - j.n.

źródło: Heavy weaponry pours into Ukraine as commanders become more desperate - POLITICO

...spektakularne doniesienia o sukcesach ukraińskiej "Landwehry" /j.n. "Troughts on the Ukrainian Defense"/ okazały się propagandowym fałszem[1]

źródło: Some Clausewitzian Thoughts on the Ukrainian Defense - Modern War Institute (usma.edu)

...wojna zastępcza - z angielska "Surrogate Warfare"[2] - NATO /czytaj U.S./ z Rosją

staje się w końcu oficjalnie uznanym faktem

"...Ukraine’s modern army, including the forces that kept the Russians from encircling and seizing Kyiv, was shaped by [...] theof years of intensive training with NATO troops across Europe..." - j.w. "Politico"

...zatem w poprawności monologu pora nie na pytanie czy warto...

ale skąd w stolicach państw Europy przekonanie, że...

"The White House" i "Pentagon" zaryzykują "w tym rozdaniu"...

Nowy Jork, Los Angeles, Dallas każde z osobna albo

...wszystkie razem jeśli

"mają w ręku blotkę" 

...Warszawy, Berlina, Paryża czy może i nawet

Londynu ?...

w tej sytuacji nowe "Pearl Harbor" albo "World Trade Center" to dziś jeszcze tymczasem dla politycznych elit znad Potomoc River niedookreślona czasem przyszłość...

"...the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, led to widespread popular support for war. 

In both cases, the deaths of thousands of Americans catalyzed lengthy deployments of U.S. troops overseas. However, the two eras varied widely in the extent to which Americans outside the military were asked to sacrifice to win the wars..."[3] /interlinia T.L./

niezobowiązującym odnotowaniem niechby tylko sobie i Muzom jeśli czytam

..."...Niebezpieczeństwo wybuchu trzeciej wojny światowej jest „poważne, realne, nie wolno go lekceważyć” - powiedział szef rosyjskiej dyplomacji Siergiej Ławrow w wywiadzie dla rosyjskiej telewizji, który Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych opublikowało na swoim kanale Telegram w poniedziałek wieczorem (25.04.2022). 

Ławrow dał jasno do zrozumienia, że uważa dostawy broni z NATO do Ukrainy za uzasadnione cele ataków dla swojego kraju.

Jednocześnie stwierdził, że nie chciałby, aby w takiej sytuacji sztucznie zawyżano ryzyko. Jest wiele stron, które tego chcą - powiedział, nie podając jednak szczegółów. Niedopuszczalność wojny jądrowej pozostaje dla Rosji zasadniczą pozycją - dodał..."[4] /interlinia T.L./

...

[1] Przy porannym kubku kawy: ...jak bywają pytania inspirujące, tak... (tadeusz-ludwiszewski.blogspot.com)

[2] Przy porannym kubku kawy: "Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited..." (tadeusz-ludwiszewski.blogspot.com)

[3] Assessing the Costs of Expecting Easy Victory – Divergent Options

[4] Rosyjski szef dyplomacji ostrzega przed trzecią wojną światową | Niemcy – bieżąca polityka niemiecka. Wiadomości DW po polsku | DW | 26.04.2022

"Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited..."

...na dole tytułowej strony małymi literkami... 

źródło: Surrogate Warfare: The role of U.S. Army Special Forces (jezail.org)

co znaczy tłumacząc na nasze, że...

dokument nie jest tajny ani nawet poufny i

każdy jeśli tylko chce może zapoznać się z jego treścią w całości lub tylko fragmentem zatytułowanym jak niżej "Definicja Wojny Zastępczej"...

Abstraktem dla niecierpliwych; "...For the purposes of this paper a surrogate force is defined as any force that acts on behalf of another and surrogate warfare is any operation that involves using a surrogate force as the primary means to accomplish the mission..." - j.n.

..."...Defining Surrogate Warfare 

In his paper Implications of Surrogate Warfare, Major Allan E, Day, USAF, offers one possible definition of surrogate warfare.

According to Day, “surrogate warfare is a major operation involving an ad hoc relationship between a nation-state and a surrogate force when that
force takes the place of a joint force component.”

Day caveats this definition by specifying that a surrogate force is only “indigenous and non-national.”

One could argue that this definition, while on its own is quite good, the conditions he applies to the definition are somewhat restrictive.

A surrogate force does not necessarily have to be indigenous, nor does it have to be non-national.

Rather, any force, regardless of whether it is indigenous to an area or not, that conducts an operation on behalf of another is probably a more accurate definition of a surrogate.

Obviously, there are many advantages to having a surrogate force that is indigenous to a region.

They have inherent knowledge of the terrain, people and culture.

They also may lend legitimacy to the operation because they are not viewed as outsiders.
In his essay Surrogate Armies: Redefining the Ground Force, Brian L. Thompson defines a surrogate army as “a military arm that is integrated into the joint force requirements, but is not
specifically a part of the joint force.”

He contends that surrogate armies provide the President and Secretary of Defense a force option if they choose not to use a U.S. military force.

The problem with this definition is that sometimes using a surrogate force is the only option available.

For the purposes of this paper a surrogate force is defined as any force that acts on behalf of another and surrogate warfare is any operation that involves using a surrogate force as the primary means to accomplish the mission..." - j.w. /interlinie T.L./

...nie wspominając o tych co z jego treścią zapoznać się powinni[1]...

doczytawszy w innych pierwszym z brzegu przykładem

"...While many factors contributed to America’s post-9/11 military struggles, one factor was the expectation of quick victory. 

Between underestimating the difficulty of stabilization and refusing to ask for material sacrifice by the public, American leaders were unprepared for a long struggle.  

This lack of preparation can serve as a lesson for leaders debating whether to fight future conflicts and preparing for difficult fights if they do." - Assessing the Costs of Expecting Easy Victory – Divergent Options [2]

...

[1] Przy porannym kubku kawy: ...jak bywają pytania inspirujące, tak... (tadeusz-ludwiszewski.blogspot.com)

[2] "...Divergent Options is a non-revenue generating non-politically aligned national security website that does not conduct political activities. [...]

About Our Logo: 

The black D and white O represent the initials of our name Divergent Options. The colors of black and white represent the way we wish the world was, simple, black and white. The gray background represents the way the world is, a combination of black and white, a place where nothing is simple. The six arrows represent multiple options that could be pursued. The arrows are amber in color to indicate caution, as every option has both risk and gain..." - About – Divergent Options