...z cyklu " look who's talking" ?

...retorycznym pytaniem

"...Russia’s mobilisation effort has been widely disparaged, with countless stories of inadequate kit and disgruntled conscripts. Ukraine’s general staff and its Western partners are more wary.

[...]

the fact that they can mobilise so fast is an early-warning dilemma for Ukraine and ultimately for nato.” Schemes run by Britain and the European Union can train around 30,000 Ukrainian troops in 18 months, he says. Russia has been able to conjure up five times as many new soldiers in a fraction of the time.

“Russian mobilisation has worked,” says General Zaluzhny. “A tsar tells them to go to war, and they go to war.” General Syrsky agrees: “The enemy shouldn’t be discounted. They are not weak…and they have very great potential in terms of manpower.” He gives the example of how Russian recruits, equipped only with small arms, successfully slowed down Ukrainian attacks in Kreminna and Svatove in Luhansk province

[...]

Mobilisation has also allowed Russia to rotate its forces on and off the front lines more frequently, he says, allowing them to rest and recuperate..."

[...]

“Just as in [the second world war]…somewhere beyond the Urals they are preparing new resources,” says General Zaluzhny..." - j.n.

źródło: Volodymyr Zelensky and his generals explain why the war hangs in the balance | The Economist

...te "syberyjskie dywizje wczoraj" Stalina

a dziś Putina...

jakby tego samego nie było dość to jeszcze do tego

"...Russian recruits, equipped only with small arms, successfully slowed down Ukrainian attacks in Kreminna and Svatove in Luhansk province..." powtórzę...

w żadnym razie nie za "Russia Today" czy "Sputnikiem" a za "The Economist" j.w. cokolwiek to może znaczyć i

w poprawności monologu prowincjusza będzie znaczy nieuniknionym biegiem zdarzeń kolejnych dni i tygodni...

...